Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 7 de 7
Filter
1.
Infect Dis Rep ; 14(6): 996-1003, 2022 Dec 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2154957

ABSTRACT

Background: The neutralizing ability of sotrovimab and casirivimab/imdevimab against the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is attenuated in the subvariant BA.5. However, the efficacy of sotrovimab in the clinical setting remains to be investigated. Methods: Patients admitted to Kishiwada City Hospital with COVID-19 delta, omicron BA.1, or BA.5 subvariants were evaluated retrospectively for serum SARS-CoV-2 S and N antibody levels using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 assay. Results: In patients with COVID-19 during the BA.5 wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-SARS-CoV-2 S antibody titers (median [interquartile range]) increased from 2154.0 (864.0−6669.3) U/mL on day 0 to 21,371.0 (19,656.3−32,225.0) U/mL on day 3 in the group treated with sotrovimab (N = 40) and were significantly higher than in the group treated with remdesivir plus dexamethasone plus baricitinib (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Treatment with sotrovimab could prevent severe disease in high-risk patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 subvariant BA.5.

2.
Case Rep Neurol Med ; 2022: 6837851, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2088982

ABSTRACT

April 2021 saw a widespread outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in Osaka, Japan. We encountered the case of a 52-year-old man who had Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). After the relief of the respiratory symptoms owing to COVID-19, the patient experienced muscle weakness, which spread from his fingers to his extremities, and was unable to walk. Further examinations revealed mild protein elevation in the cerebrospinal fluid. In addition, nerve conduction studies showed demyelinating polyneuropathy, leading to the diagnosis of Guillain-Barré syndrome. After the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin and intravenous methylprednisolone, his symptoms drastically improved, and he was able to walk unaided 21 days after the onset of symptoms. On day 40, the patient was discharged with minimal muscle fatigue. Because Guillain-Barré syndrome associated with COVID-19 is expected to have a good prognosis, early diagnosis and treatment are important. Therefore, Guillain-Barré syndrome should be considered as a possible factor for muscle weakness during and after COVID-19 treatment.

3.
Infect Dis Rep ; 14(2): 250-257, 2022 Apr 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1776189

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Aluminium reduces severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) survival in experimental settings. It is unknown whether adding an aluminium gauze to a mask reduces the SARS-CoV-2 RNA load in the mask and whether SARS-CoV-2 is detectable in the breath that permeates through such a mask in clinical settings. METHODS: Patients admitted to Kishiwada City Hospital, Osaka, Japan, between July 2021 and September 2021 were enrolled in the study. Non-woven masks comprising filters with 99% viral filtration efficacy and aluminium and cotton gauzes attached to plastic collection cases were developed. All participants wore the experimental mask models for three hours. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients who wore the final model masks were analysed in this study. The Ct values of the nucleocapsid gene and envelope gene of SARS-CoV-2 were significantly higher in the aluminium gauze than in the cotton gauze. SARS-CoV-2 RNA was detected in the masks of 8 out of 12 vaccinated patients (66.7%). Although breath condensates were collected behind both aluminium and cotton gauzes, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not detected in these condensates. CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that non-woven masks with an aluminium gauze may obstruct SARS-CoV-2 transmission in clinical settings better than non-woven masks with cotton gauzes.

4.
Respir Med Res ; 81: 100903, 2022 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1747609

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Remdesivir with dexamethasone and remdesivir with baricitinib are effective in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients. However, there has been few evidence regarding the efficacy of the combination of baricitinib, remdesivir, and dexamethasone in hypoxic COVID-19 patients. METHODS: Consecutive patients who required oxygen therapy at the time of admission and received remdesivir and dexamethasone at Kishiwada City Hospital between March 1, 2021 and May 31, 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 90 patients were investigated, including 30 receiving a combination of remdesivir, dexamethasone, and baricitinib (baricitinib group) and 60 receiving remdesivir and dexamethasone (control group). The use of direct oral anticoagulants, the level of C-reactive protein, and chest X-ray abnormalities were significantly higher in the baricitinib group than in the control group. Patients in the baricitinib group recovered a median of four days faster than those in the control group (median, 7 days vs. 11 days; Gray's test, p < 0.001). The recovery rate was 90.0% in the baricitinib group and 63.3% in the control group (p = 0.011). Fine and Gray regression analysis showed that adjusted rate ratio for recovery with the baricitinib combination therapy was 5.26 (95% confidential interval, 1.99-13.9; p < 0.001). The incidence of new onset of bacterial infection was 6.7% in the baricitinib group and 16.7% in the control group (p = 0.324). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the combination of baricitinib, dexamethasone, and remdesivir is effective and tolerable in hypoxic patients with COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Drug Treatment , COVID-19 , Adenosine Monophosphate/analogs & derivatives , Adult , Alanine/analogs & derivatives , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , Azetidines , COVID-19/complications , COVID-19/epidemiology , Dexamethasone , Humans , Purines , Pyrazoles , Retrospective Studies , SARS-CoV-2 , Sulfonamides
5.
Int J Surg Case Rep ; 91: 106792, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1654595

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Some patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have acute abdomen and need surgery. However, surgery in the acute phase of COVID-19 is associated with worse postoperative outcomes and an increased risk of mortality. We report a case of a patient with COVID-19 who developed intestinal perforation that was treated acutely with antibiotics and delayed surgical intervention. PRESENTATION OF CASE: A 79-year-old man with COVID-19 was treated with remdesivir and dexamethasone, and his respiratory symptoms and hypoxia improved. However, abdominal symptoms developed, and intestinal perforation occurred. As the nasopharyngeal swab PCR test was positive for SARS-CoV-2, conservative treatment with tazobactam/piperacillin was started to avoid surgery in the acute phase of COVID-19. An intraperitoneal abscess was confirmed on follow-up computed tomography. Emergent laparoscopic lavage and drainage, and transverse colon stoma construction were performed with medical staff using full personal protective equipment. Bacterial culture from the ascites detected Escherichia coli and Bacteroides. The SARS-CoV-2 PCR test of the ascites sample was negative. No infection was observed in the medical staff. DISCUSSION: COVID-19 has been associated with a higher perioperative risk and postoperative mortality. There has also been a report of ascitic fluid testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 on PCR, suggesting the possibility of intraoperative aerosolization. Avoiding surgical treatment in the acute phase of COVID-19 may reduce deaths from perioperative complications. CONCLUSION: Our case suggests that in acute COVID-19 lung infection, careful observation and delayed surgical treatment could prevent worsening of the COVID-19 and reduce the risk of infection to the medical staff.

6.
J Infect Chemother ; 28(2): 321-325, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1521285

ABSTRACT

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which leads to critical pneumonia, although the clinical courses vary. In some cases, COVID-19 pneumonia causes secondary pulmonary fibrosis, which can retain radiological changes and prolong respiratory symptoms. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) secondary to COVID-19 is thought to be caused by multiple pathologies, such as excessive cytokines and abnormal repair processes elaborated by lung cells (epithelium, mesenchyme, and alveolar macrophages) after lung injury rather than viral invasion itself. Immunosuppression therapy may improve chronic respiratory symptoms and radiological changes in post-COVID-19 ILD, although the treatment is not yet established. Herein, we report three patients with post-COVID-19 ILD who presented with profound hypoxemia that had a good response to high-dose corticosteroid therapy. Further and larger studies are needed to establish post-COVID-19 ILD.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypoxia/drug therapy , Lung , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/drug therapy , SARS-CoV-2
7.
Open Forum Infect Dis ; 8(7): ofab282, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1320321

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Detailed differences in clinical information between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pneumonia (CP), which is the main phenotype of SARS-CoV-2 disease, and influenza pneumonia (IP) are still unclear. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted by including patients with CP who were hospitalized between January and June 2020 and a retrospective cohort of patients with IP hospitalized from 2009 to 2020. We compared the clinical presentations and studied the prognostic factors of CP and IP. RESULTS: Compared with the IP group (n = 66), in the multivariate analysis, the CP group (n = 362) had a lower percentage of patients with underlying asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (P < .01), lower neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (P < .01), lower systolic blood pressure (P < .01), higher diastolic blood pressure (P < .01), lower aspartate aminotransferase level (P < .05), higher serum sodium level (P < .05), and more frequent multilobar infiltrates (P < .05). The diagnostic scoring system based on these findings showed excellent differentiation between CP and IP (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.889). Moreover, the prognostic predictors were different between CP and IP. CONCLUSIONS: Comprehensive differences between CP and IP were revealed, highlighting the need for early differentiation between these 2 pneumonias in clinical settings.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL